Lacey Sivak v. John Doe
| LACEY MARK SIVAK |
| JOHN DOE |
| 20-35216 |
| March 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak motion for protection of property and files. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/01/2020. [11684387] (CW) [Entered: 05/07/2020 08:17 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): The court has received appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The motion, however, is not accompanied by a completed financial affidavit. Within 60 days after the date of this order, appellant shall complete and file a Form 4 financial affidavit. Failure to comply with this order may result in the denial of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on appellant. Briefing is stayed pending resolution of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11677996] (CKP) [Entered: 05/01/2020 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak in 19-35713, 20-35211, 20-35216 motion possible request for motion regarding storage of legal materials. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/18/2020. [11670402] [19-35713, 20-35211, 20-35216] (CW) [Entered: 04/23/2020 07:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak letter dated 03/16/2020 re: notice - case at issue. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11640180] (CW) [Entered: 03/24/2020 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak opening brief (Informal: No) 5 pages. Served on 03/15/2020. Major deficiencies: motion pending. [11639010] (KWG) [Entered: 03/23/2020 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak request to proceed without cost. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/14/2020. [11637382] (RL) [Entered: 03/20/2020 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of this courts docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis shall result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk shall serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on appellant. [11631574] (AF) [Entered: 03/16/2020 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lacey Mark Sivak opening brief due 05/08/2020. [11624796] (OC) [Entered: 03/10/2020 01:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lacey Sivak v. John Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: LACEY MARK SIVAK | |
| Represented By: | Lacey Mark Sivak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JOHN DOE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
