Lisa Earl, et al v. Scott Campbell, et al
| O.B., a minor child, OSCEOLA BLUEHORSE, on behalf of, K.S., a minor child, I.B., a minor child, K.W., a minor child and LISA EARL, individually and on behalf of on behalf of the ESTATE OF JACQUELINE SALYERS, on behalf of |
| CITY OF TACOMA, SCOTT CAMPBELL, and the marital community of Scott and Jane Doe Campbell, JACK NASWORTHY, the marital community of Nasworthy and Jane Doe Nasworthy, SCOTT SHAFNER, the marital community of Shafner and Jane Doe Shafner and CHARLES TAYLOR, the marital community of Taylor and Jane Doe Taylor |
| 20-35217 |
| March 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: th): Granting Motion [ # 6 ] (ECF Filing) filed by Appellants to extend time to file the opening brief. Appellants Osceola Bluehorse, Lisa Earl, I.B., K.S., K.W. and O.B. opening brief due 07/08/2020. Appellees Scott Campbell, City of Tacoma, Jack Nasworthy, Scott Shafner and Charles Taylor answering brief due 08/07/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. This order was issued prior to the expiration of time within which a response may be filed. Fed. R. App. P. 27(b). [11673288] (TH) [Entered: 04/27/2020 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Osceola Bluehorse, Lisa Earl, I.B., K.S., K.W. and O.B. Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 07/08/2020. Date of service: 04/27/2020. [11672969] [20-35217] (Lobsenz, James) [Entered: 04/27/2020 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [11652443] (LW) [Entered: 04/06/2020 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 04/03/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11637290] (LW) [Entered: 03/20/2020 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/19/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11635344]. [20-35217] (AD) [Entered: 03/19/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Osceola Bluehorse, Lisa Earl, I.B., K.S., K.W. and O.B. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/19/2020. [11635049] [20-35217] (Lobsenz, James) [Entered: 03/19/2020 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Osceola Bluehorse, Lisa Earl, I.B., K.S., K.W. and O.B. Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/17/2020. Appellants Osceola Bluehorse, Lisa Earl, I.B., K.S., K.W. and O.B. opening brief due 05/08/2020. Appellees Scott Campbell, City of Tacoma, Jack Nasworthy, Scott Shafner and Charles Taylor answering brief due 06/08/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11624783] (JBS) [Entered: 03/10/2020 01:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
