Daniel Bach v. Jeffrey Uttecht
| JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden |
| DANIEL BENJAMIN BACH |
| 20-35274 |
| March 25, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KENNETH K. LEE) Appellants motions for relief from confinement and for restoration (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 5 ], [ # 6 ]) are construed as a motion for reconsideration. So construed, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [11683947] (OC) [Entered: 05/07/2020 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Daniel Benjamin Bach motion for restoration. Deficiencies: Case closed. [11664793] (QDL) [Entered: 04/17/2020 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Daniel Benjamin Bach motion for immediate relief from confinement. Deficiencies: Case closed. [11664791] (QDL) [Entered: 04/17/2020 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (JOHN B. OWENS and MARK J. BENNETT) The request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11663999] (JMR) [Entered: 04/17/2020 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Daniel Benjamin Bach motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/25/2020. [11641873] (JPD) [Entered: 03/25/2020 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Daniel Benjamin Bach motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/25/2020. [11641869] (JPD) [Entered: 03/25/2020 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/03/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11641701] (JPD) [Entered: 03/25/2020 02:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Daniel Bach v. Jeffrey Uttecht | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DANIEL BENJAMIN BACH | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Benjamin Bach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
