USA v. Ebenezer Howe, IV, et al
EBENEZER K. HOWE IV and PHI DEVELOPMENT LLC |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
20-35281 |
March 26, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: DA): A review of the record reflects that this appeal No. 20-35281 was opened in error. The Clerk shall close appeal No. 20-35281 as opened in error. Appellants petition for writ of mandamus filed on March 24, 2020 remains pending in docket No. 20-70849. [11647050] (AF) [Entered: 03/31/2020 11:26 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA Motion to consolidate cases 20-70849, 20-35281, Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 03/31/2020. [11646556] [20-35281] (Sheehan, Anthony) [Entered: 03/31/2020 08:04 AM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Anthony T. Sheehan for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 20-35281. [11646545] (NAC) [Entered: 03/31/2020 07:57 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Anthony T. Sheehan (U.S. Dep't of Justice, Tax Division, Appellate Section; P.O. Box 502; Washington, DC 20044) for Appellee USA. Date of service: 03/31/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11646543] [20-35281] (Sheehan, Anthony) [Entered: 03/31/2020 07:55 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Ebenezer K. Howe IV and PHI Development LLC opening brief due 05/28/2020. Appellee United States of America answering brief due 06/29/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11642630] (RT) [Entered: 03/26/2020 11:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.