Cytline, LLC, et al v. Public Utility District No. 2, et al
TELCO 214 WHOLESALE SOFTWARE, INC., a Washington corporation and CORSAIR INVESTMENTS WA, LLC, a Washington limited liabiity company |
509 MINE, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, BLOCKTREE PROPERTIES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, MINERS UNITED, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, WEHASH TECHNOLOGY, LLP, a Washington limited liability company, CYTLINE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MARK VARGAS, an individual and MIM INVESTORS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company |
BOB BERND, individually and in his official capacity, DOES, 1-10, LARRY SCHAAPMAN, individually and in his official capacity, TOM FLINT, individually and in his official capacity, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation, TERRY BREWER, individually and in his official capacity, DALE WALKER, individually and in his official capacity, JUDY WILSON and NELSON COX |
20-35324 |
April 9, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
CYTLINE, LLC V. PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [11683810] (LW) [Entered: 05/07/2020 01:06 PM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 05/05/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11664914] (LW) [Entered: 04/17/2020 04:01 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/16/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11663747]. [20-35324] (AD) [Entered: 04/16/2020 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants 509 Mine, LLC, Blocktree Properties, LLC, Cytline, LLC, MIM Investors, LLC, Miners United, LLC, WeHash Technology, LLP and Mark Vargas Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/16/2020. [11663161] [20-35324] (Christensen, Eric) [Entered: 04/16/2020 01:34 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants 509 Mine, LLC, Blocktree Properties, LLC, Cytline, LLC, MIM Investors, LLC, Miners United, LLC, Mark Vargas and WeHash Technology, LLP Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/16/2020. Transcript ordered by 05/11/2020. Transcript due 06/08/2020. Appellants 509 Mine, LLC, Blocktree Properties, LLC, Cytline, LLC, MIM Investors, LLC, Miners United, LLC, Mark Vargas and WeHash Technology, LLP opening brief due 07/20/2020. Appellees Bob Bernd, Terry Brewer, Nelson Cox, Does, Tom Flint, Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington, Larry Schaapman, Dale Walker and Judy Wilson answering brief due 08/20/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11656786] (RT) [Entered: 04/09/2020 04:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.