Barbara Gibson, et al v. USA
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JOHN TRAVIS MORGAN GIBSON, DIXIE LEE GIBSON and BARBARA A. GIBSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Johnny G. Gibson, and for herself |
| 20-35333 |
| April 13, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Gibson v. United States
|
| BARBARA GIBSON V. USA |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA response to motion ([ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 06/08/2020. [11714372] [20-35333] (Spraker, Chad) [Entered: 06/08/2020 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11694490] (CL) [Entered: 05/18/2020 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellants Dixie Lee Gibson, John Travis Morgan Gibson and Barbara A. Gibson Correspondence: Transcripts for Appeal. Date of service: 05/11/2020 [11686974] [20-35333] (Morrison, John) [Entered: 05/11/2020 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/18/2020, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11676659] (CL) [Entered: 04/30/2020 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MN): Appellees motion for an extension of time to oppose appellants motion for partial summary affirmance is granted. The opposition is now due June 17, 2020. Appellants optional reply is due within 7 days after service of the opposition. [11671441] (WL) [Entered: 04/24/2020 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/21/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11667256]. [20-35333] (AD) [Entered: 04/21/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Barbara A. Gibson, Dixie Lee Gibson and John Travis Morgan Gibson Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/21/2020. [11666665] [20-35333] (Morrison, John) [Entered: 04/21/2020 08:19 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA Motion to extend time to file a response until 06/17/2020. Date of service: 04/20/2020. [11665649] [20-35333] (Spraker, Chad) [Entered: 04/20/2020 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Dixie Lee Gibson and John Travis Morgan Gibson Motion for summary affirmance. Date of service: 04/16/2020. [11663038] [20-35333] (Morrison, John) [Entered: 04/16/2020 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Barbara A. Gibson, Dixie Lee Gibson and John Travis Morgan Gibson Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/20/2020. Transcript ordered by 05/11/2020. Transcript due 06/09/2020. Appellants Barbara A. Gibson, Dixie Lee Gibson and John Travis Morgan Gibson opening brief due 07/20/2020. Appellee United States of America answering brief due 08/19/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11658558] (JBS) [Entered: 04/13/2020 09:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
