Jayakrishnan Nair, et al v. Channa Copeland, et al
| RAJAKUMARI SUSHEELKUMAR, JAYAKRISHNAN K. NAIR and SUKANYA SUSHEEL |
| RAMSEY, Dr., HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER, CITY OF SNOQUALMIE, JOHN DOE, # 1, CHANNA COPELAND, MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC., DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, a State of Washington agency, RANDY WILSON and ANDREW HAHN, Dr. |
| 20-35367 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Callie A. Castillo for party(s) Appellee John Doe, in case 20-35367. [11680098] (QDL) [Entered: 05/04/2020 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Callie A. Castillo (Lane Powell PC, 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4200, P.O. Box 91302, Seattle, WA 98111-9402) for Appellee John Doe. Date of service: 05/04/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11680057] [20-35367] (Castillo, Callie) [Entered: 05/04/2020 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Jayakrishnan K. Nair, Sukanya Susheel and Rajakumari Susheelkumar opening brief due 07/02/2020. Appellees City of Snoqualmie, Channa Copeland, Department of Social and Health Services, Andrew Hahn, Harborview Medical Center, John Doe, Molina Healthcare, Inc., Ramsey and Randy Wilson answering brief due 08/03/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11675881] (RT) [Entered: 04/29/2020 02:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
