Benjamin Barber, et al v. Pat Garrett
Petitioner: JAY DAVID LEATHERWOOD and JAYCOB PATRICK HOLTEN
Petitioner / Appellant: BENJAMIN BARBER
Respondent / Appellee: PAT GARRETT
Case Number: 20-35419
Filed: May 15, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2020 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Benjamin Barber motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. [11710398] (RR) [Entered: 06/03/2020 06:57 PM]
June 1, 2020 Filing 4 Received notice of change of address dated 05/24/2020 from Benjamin Barber. New address: Washington County Jail, 215 Adams, M535, Hillsboro, OR 97123-3874. [11710396]--[Edited: address updated. 06/04/2020 by SLM] (RR) [Entered: 06/03/2020 06:49 PM]
June 1, 2020 Filing 3 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court filed 5/28/20. [11706697] (CW) [Entered: 06/01/2020 11:49 AM]
May 29, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KMB): This appeal was filed while a timely Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4) motion was pending in the district court. The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4), and proceedings in this court will be stayed until the district court decides the May 14, 2020 and May 28, 2020 motions. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1994); see also Tripati v. Henman, 845 F.3d 205, 206 (9th Cir. 1988) (holding that a district court retains jurisdiction to consider a timely Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4) tolling motion even if the motion is filed subsequent to a notice of appeal). Within 21 days after the district courts decision, appellant must notify this court in writing of the decision and state whether he wishes to move forward with this appeal. To challenge the decision on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time set by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). A copy of this order will be sent to the district court. [11705671] (AF) [Entered: 05/29/2020 04:15 PM]
May 15, 2020 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 04/30/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11691896] (JMR) [Entered: 05/15/2020 09:47 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Benjamin Barber, et al v. Pat Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: BENJAMIN BARBER
Represented By: Benjamin Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: PAT GARRETT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAY DAVID LEATHERWOOD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAYCOB PATRICK HOLTEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?