Robert Hughes v. Kevin Bovencamp, et al
Defendant / Appellee: KEN E. MOORE, KEVIN BOVENCAMP, Assistant Secretary/Deputy Director Washington State Dept of Corrections, SMITH, Dr./M.D., K. KROHOA, M. HOLTHE, Custody Supervisor, B. BLAIR and K. SAWYER, M.D.
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT WAYNE HUGHES
Case Number: 20-35449
Filed: May 21, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2020 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellees B. Blair, Kevin Bovencamp, M. Holthe, K. Krohoa, Ken E. Moore, K. Sawyer and Smith reply to response to Court order dated 05/28/2020. Date of service: 07/02/2020. [11740914] [20-35449] (Loynd, Jennifer) [Entered: 07/02/2020 11:48 AM]
June 22, 2020 Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/22/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11729980]. [20-35449] (AD) [Entered: 06/22/2020 06:44 PM]
June 22, 2020 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Robert Wayne Hughes motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11729730] (JFF) [Entered: 06/22/2020 03:57 PM]
June 22, 2020 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Robert Wayne Hughes Mediation Questionnaire. Served on 05/12/2020. [11729717] (JFF) [Entered: 06/22/2020 03:52 PM]
June 22, 2020 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Robert Wayne Hughes motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11729713] (JFF) [Entered: 06/22/2020 03:50 PM]
June 22, 2020 Filing 3 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Robert Wayne Hughes opening brief of 27 pages (Informal: No). Served on 06/22/2020. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed, no certificate of service. [11729492] (KWG) [Entered: 06/22/2020 02:32 PM]
May 28, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11704045] (CKP) [Entered: 05/28/2020 02:17 PM]
May 21, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Robert Wayne Hughes opening brief due 07/28/2020. Appellees B. Blair, Kevin Bovencamp, M. Holthe, K. Krohoa, Ken E. Moore, K. Sawyer and Smith answering brief due 08/28/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11698187] (RT) [Entered: 05/21/2020 02:41 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Hughes v. Kevin Bovencamp, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEN E. MOORE
Represented By: Jennifer Loynd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEVIN BOVENCAMP, Assistant Secretary/Deputy Director Washington State Dept of Corrections
Represented By: Jennifer Loynd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SMITH, Dr./M.D.
Represented By: Jennifer Loynd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: K. KROHOA
Represented By: Jennifer Loynd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: M. HOLTHE, Custody Supervisor
Represented By: Jennifer Loynd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: B. BLAIR
Represented By: Jennifer Loynd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: K. SAWYER, M.D.
Represented By: Jennifer Loynd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ROBERT WAYNE HUGHES
Represented By: Robert Wayne Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?