Tracey Godfrey v. Lynn Guyer, et al
LYNN GUYER and NEF-MSP |
TRACEY GODFREY |
20-35518 |
June 9, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion to take notice of fact:. Paper filing deficiency: case close. [11760362] (RR) [Entered: 07/21/2020 11:20 AM] |
Filing 17 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey document entitled "Lack of jurisdiction at resentencing." Paper filing deficiency: None. [11755027] (RR) [Entered: 07/16/2020 10:51 AM] |
Filing 16 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey apraisail of law. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11755004] (RR) [Entered: 07/16/2020 10:47 AM] |
Filing 14 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS): The requests for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 2 ], [ # 3 ] and [ # 11 ]) are denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11750863] (AF) [Entered: 07/13/2020 02:20 PM] |
Filing 13 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey apraisail of law.. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11750231] (RR) [Entered: 07/13/2020 10:09 AM] |
Filing 12 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey FRAP 36-3 citation of unpublished dispositions or orders. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11750228] (RR) [Entered: 07/13/2020 10:06 AM] |
Filing 11 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/30/2020. [11743146] (CW) [Entered: 07/06/2020 03:20 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for relief due to a miscarriage of justice. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/26/2020. [11741131] (CW) [Entered: 07/02/2020 02:20 PM] |
Filing 15 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey apraisail of law. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11754972] (RR) [Entered: 07/16/2020 10:35 AM] |
Filing 9 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion to reinstate a valid legal sentence. Deficiencies: None. [11737672] (RR) [Entered: 06/30/2020 08:59 AM] |
Filing 8 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey document entitled " Brief of applicable State Law" Paper filing deficiency: None. [11737644] (RR) [Entered: 06/30/2020 08:52 AM] |
Filing 7 Received Appellant Tracey Godfrey notice regarding invocation of consitutional right. [11734373] (RR) [Entered: 06/25/2020 10:32 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey letter dated 06/15/2020 re: criminal complaint. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11731531] (RR) [Entered: 06/23/2020 10:39 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey letter dated 06/16/2020 re: USCS Fed Rules of Crim Proc. R. 3 complaint.. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11731530] (RR) [Entered: 06/23/2020 10:36 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion to take notice of proof of constitutional violation. Deficiencies: None. [11728546] (RR) [Entered: 06/22/2020 04:26 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey supplemental motion for certificate of appealability. (Entitled: additional information, etc) Deficiencies: None. [11728538] (RR) [Entered: 06/22/2020 03:03 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. (Entitled: Petition for COA) [11722595] (RR) [Entered: 06/15/2020 05:58 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/05/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11716086] (JMR) [Entered: 06/09/2020 01:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.