Mark Moore, Sr. v. State of Oregon
| STATE OF OREGON |
| MARK LYLE MOORE, Sr. |
| 20-35542 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [11774171] (CKP) [Entered: 08/03/2020 02:40 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Mark Lyle Moore, Sr. motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11744692] (JFF) [Entered: 07/07/2020 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Mark Lyle Moore, Sr. motion to extend time.. Deficiencies: None. [11744688] (JFF) [Entered: 07/07/2020 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Mark Lyle Moore, Sr. motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. . [11744678] (JFF) [Entered: 07/07/2020 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received notice of change of address dated from. New address: 11538 SE Reedway St Portland, OR 97266. [11744643] --[Edited: Updated Address. 07/07/2020 by TYL] (JFF) [Entered: 07/07/2020 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 Streamlined request by Appellant Mark Lyle Moore, Sr. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Mark Lyle Moore Sr. opening brief due 09/21/2020. [11743107] (BG) [Entered: 07/06/2020 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Mark Lyle Moore Sr. opening brief due 08/20/2020. [11724504] (RT) [Entered: 06/17/2020 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mark Moore, Sr. v. State of Oregon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: STATE OF OREGON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: MARK LYLE MOORE, Sr. | |
| Represented By: | Mark Lyle Moore Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
