Cottonwood Environmental Law v. Steve Bullock, et al
USDA-ANIMAL & PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior, CAM SHOLLY, in his official capacity as Park Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park, LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service, U.S. FOREST SERVICE and NATIONAL PARK SERVICE |
STEVE BULLOCK, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Montana |
COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER |
20-35588 |
July 1, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Steve Bullock reply to response (). Date of service: 07/28/2020. [11769795] [20-35588] (Graybill, Raphael) [Entered: 07/28/2020 03:50 PM] |
Filing 7 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [7]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Errata to Answering Brief ([ # 6 ] Response to OSC (ECF Filing)). Filed by Appellant Cottonwood Environmental Law Center. Date of service: 07/21/2020. [11761358] [20-35588] (Meyer, John) [Entered: 07/21/2020 11:11 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Cottonwood Environmental Law Center response to motion (motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 07/21/2020. [11761357] [20-35588] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type and attached PDF of exhibits. 07/22/2020 by SLM] (Meyer, John) [Entered: 07/21/2020 11:01 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): In light of appellees pending motions to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction and for sanctions, the courts July 2, 2020 order is vacated. Briefing in this appeal is stayed pending resolution of the motion to dismiss. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11746242] (JPD) [Entered: 07/08/2020 02:34 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11741452] (JPD) [Entered: 07/02/2020 04:38 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellee Steve Bullock Motion for sanctions. Date of service: 07/02/2020. [11741012] [20-35588] (Graybill, Raphael) [Entered: 07/02/2020 01:18 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee Steve Bullock Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 07/02/2020. [11741008] [20-35588] (Graybill, Raphael) [Entered: 07/02/2020 01:16 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Cottonwood Environmental Law Center Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/08/2020. Transcript ordered by 07/30/2020. Transcript due 08/31/2020. Appellant Cottonwood Environmental Law Center opening brief due 10/08/2020. Appellee Steve Bullock answering brief due 11/09/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11739653] (JBS) [Entered: 07/01/2020 11:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.