Roland Ma v. City of Seattle, et al
| CITY OF SEATTLE and SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| ROLAND MA |
| 20-35597 |
| July 6, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Roland Ma response to order to show cause dated 07/22/2020. Date of service: 07/22/2020 [11762088] [20-35597] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 7/22/2020 by TYL] (Ma, Roland) [Entered: 07/22/2020 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has denied appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and certified that this appeal is frivolous and not taken in good faith. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [11761466] (CKP) [Entered: 07/22/2020 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 Deleted Incorrect Entry [11761456] (CKP) [Entered: 07/22/2020 08:18 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received District Court CERTIFICATION re Plaintiff's 92 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis: The Court finds that plaintiff's claims are frivolous and this appeal is not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW). [11760000] (NAC) [Entered: 07/21/2020 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Roland Ma Stipulated Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 07/18/2020. [11757878] [20-35597] (Ma, Roland) [Entered: 07/18/2020 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11743034] (CKP) [Entered: 07/06/2020 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-35597: Due] ). [11743027] (CKP) [Entered: 07/06/2020 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Roland Ma opening brief due 09/04/2020. Appellees City of Seattle and Seattle Police Department answering brief due 10/05/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11742786] (RT) [Entered: 07/06/2020 01:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
