USA v. Alan Bartlett
ALAN M. BARTLETT |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
20-35601 |
July 7, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Alan M. Bartlett motion to set briefing schedule, to make caption corrections. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/12/2020. [11759725] (CW) [Entered: 07/20/2020 07:53 PM] |
Filing 2 Received copy of District Court order filed on 07/14/2020 denying COA. [11753313] (CW) [Entered: 07/15/2020 07:20 AM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11744005] (JBS) [Entered: 07/07/2020 10:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Alan Bartlett | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: ALAN M. BARTLETT | |
Represented By: | Alan M. Bartlett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Stephen Corso |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.