Lindsey Buero v. Amazon.com Services, Inc., et al
| LINDSEY BUERO, Individually and on behalf of all similarly situated |
| AMAZON.COM, INC., a foreign corporation and AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC., a foreign corporation, DBA Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
| 20-35633 |
| July 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Buero v. Amazon.com Services, Inc.
|
|
LINDSEY BUERO V. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC., ET AL
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MN): Appellees motion for an extension of time (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) to oppose appellants motion for certification is granted. The opposition is now due September 22, 2020. Appellants optional reply is due within 7 days after service of the opposition. The briefing schedule is stayed pending further order of the court. [11817723] (WL) [Entered: 09/09/2020 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellees Amazon.com Services, Inc. and AMZN Unopposed Motion to extend time to file opposition until 09/22/2020. Date of service: 09/01/2020. [11810005] [20-35633] (Kenneally, Michael) [Entered: 09/01/2020 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lindsey Buero Unopposed Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 08/31/2020. [11808542] [20-35633] (Schuck, David) [Entered: 08/31/2020 05:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lindsey Buero Motion for certification to Oregon State Supreme Court. Date of service: 08/26/2020. [11803898] [20-35633] (Schuck, David) [Entered: 08/26/2020 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11780280] (VS) [Entered: 08/06/2020 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 08/05/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11761955] (VS) [Entered: 07/22/2020 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/21/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11761264]. [20-35633] (AD) [Entered: 07/21/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lindsey Buero Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/21/2020. [11761086] [20-35633] (Schuck, David) [Entered: 07/21/2020 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lindsey Buero Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/23/2020. Appellant Lindsey Buero opening brief due 09/14/2020. Appellees Amazon.com Services, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. answering brief due 10/14/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11754718] (JBS) [Entered: 07/16/2020 08:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
