Michael Reynolds v. USA
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS |
| 20-35688 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND) Appellants motion for reconsideration en banc (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 3 ] & [ # 4 ]) is denied on behalf of the court. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10; 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.11. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [11844249] (JBS) [Entered: 10/01/2020 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Michael Curtis Reynolds supplemental motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 09/14/2020. Deficiencies: None [11841236] (NAC) [Entered: 09/29/2020 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Michael Curtis Reynolds motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 09/14/2020. Deficiencies: None. [11837223] (NAC) [Entered: 09/25/2020 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and DANIEL A. BRESS) The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); Porter v. Adams, 244 F.3d 1006, 1007 (9th Cir. 2001) (order) (holding that a successive 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion disguised as a 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition requires a certificate of appealability). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11823038] (JPD) [Entered: 09/14/2020 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 06/29/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. (Electronic: PACER) [11778805] (RT) [Entered: 08/05/2020 04:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Michael Reynolds v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS | |
| Represented By: | Michael Curtis Reynolds |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
