Preferred Professional Insuran v. Patrick McGree, et al
| PATRICK MCGREE, P. S., M. T., S. P. and B. B. |
| PREFERRED PROFESSIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 20-35706 |
| August 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Patrick McGree reply to response to order to show cause dated 08/26/2020. Date of service: 09/25/2020. [11837448] [20-35706]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 09/28/2020 by SLM] (Papez, Jacqueline) [Entered: 09/25/2020 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 11/10/2020, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [11836354] (BLS) [Entered: 09/24/2020 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Preferred Professional Insurance Company response to order to show cause dated 08/26/2020. Date of service: 09/15/2020. [11823973] [20-35706] (Tsomaya, Alexander) [Entered: 09/15/2020 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also Am. States Ins. Co. v. Dastar Corp., 318 F.3d 881, 884, 889-90 (9th Cir. 2003) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction where parties attempted to manufacture appellate jurisdiction over otherwise non-appealable partial summary judgment order regarding insurers duty to defend). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11804153] (AF) [Entered: 08/26/2020 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 09/23/2020, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11796190] (BLS) [Entered: 08/20/2020 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/18/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11793296]. [20-35706] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Preferred Professional Insurance Company Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/18/2020. [11792875] [20-35706] (Pagnotta, Nicholas) [Entered: 08/18/2020 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Preferred Professional Insurance Company Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/19/2020. Transcript ordered by 09/10/2020. Transcript due 10/09/2020. Appellant Preferred Professional Insurance Company opening brief due 11/18/2020. Appellees B. B., Patrick McGree, S. P., P. S. and M. T. answering brief due 12/18/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11786022] (RT) [Entered: 08/12/2020 09:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
