Randy Hoge, Jr. v. Duane Frieze, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: RANDY L. HOGE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: DUANE FRIEZE, Deputy, Badge #289, SUSEE, Deputy and TACADENA, Deputy
Case Number: 20-35710
Filed: August 12, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 21, 2021 RANDY HOGE, JR. V. DUANE FRIEZE

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2020 Filing 7 Received original and 6 copies of Appellant Randy L. Hoge, Jr. opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 08/24/2020. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed. [11812225] (LA) [Entered: 09/03/2020 11:29 AM]
August 31, 2020 Filing 6 Received notice of change of address dated 08/27/2020 from Randy L. Hoge, Jr.. New address: globally changed. [11808979] (CW) [Entered: 09/01/2020 09:13 AM]
August 31, 2020 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Randy L. Hoge, Jr. response to 8/17/20 order. Served on 08/24/2020. [11808771] (CW) [Entered: 09/01/2020 07:28 AM]
August 24, 2020 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Randy L. Hoge, Jr. motion to remove certain defendants. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/24/2020. [11801283] (CW) [Entered: 08/25/2020 07:48 AM]
August 24, 2020 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Randy L. Hoge, Jr. motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/20/2020. [11801281] (CW) [Entered: 08/25/2020 07:47 AM]
August 17, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11791710] (CKP) [Entered: 08/17/2020 01:55 PM]
August 12, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Randy L. Hoge Jr. opening brief due 10/09/2020. [11786084] (JPD) [Entered: 08/12/2020 09:40 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Randy Hoge, Jr. v. Duane Frieze, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RANDY L. HOGE, Jr.
Represented By: Randy L. Hoge Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DUANE FRIEZE, Deputy, Badge #289
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUSEE, Deputy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TACADENA, Deputy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?