Tracey Godfrey v. Jim Salmonson
TRACEY GODFREY |
JIM SALMONSON |
20-35833 |
September 23, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for denvov review. Deficiencies: None. [11849417] (JFF) [Entered: 10/06/2020 02:13 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for denvov review of 60(b)(4). Deficiencies: None. [11846611] (RR) [Entered: 10/05/2020 06:24 AM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 08/20/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. (Electronic: PACER) [11834653] (RT) [Entered: 09/23/2020 02:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Tracey Godfrey v. Jim Salmonson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: TRACEY GODFREY | |
Represented By: | Tracey Godfrey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: JIM SALMONSON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.