Frederick Allman v. USDOJ, et al
ERIC M. BOSSE, Esquire, Bankruptcy Professional Agent USTO District of Oregon, MICHELLE H. KERIN, Assistant US Attorney, ELIZABETH L. PERRIS, Former Judge US Bankruptcy Court District of Oregon, CYNTHIA J. MORRIS, Bankruptcy Trustee Paralegal USTO District of Oregon, S. AMANDA MARSHALL, Former US Attorney, TRACEY BARON, Agent USTO District of Oregon, PAMELA J. GRIFFTH, Former US Trustee District of Oregon, MONTGOMERY W. COBB, Bankruptcy Professional Agent USTO District of Oregon, KENNETH S. EILER, Bankruptcy Trustee, JOSEPH LAMONICA, US Attorney Investigator, M. VIVIENNE POPPERL, Former Attorney, PAMELA J. GRIFFITH, Former US Trustee, STEPHEN P. ARNOT, USTO, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KIMBERLY ARDEN, Non-Debtor and Co-Conspirator, CLIFFORD J. WHITE III, Director, UNKNOWN PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY FUND AND/OR FIDUCIARY SURETY BOND, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, PETER C. MCKITTRICK, Former Bankruptcy Trustee, BILLY J. WILLIAMS, USAO and MICHELLE BARON, Agent USTO District of Oregon |
FREDERICK L. ALLMAN |
20-35839 |
September 25, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (WAF, MSB and JSB) [11886684] (JFF) [Entered: 11/09/2020 01:59 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Frederick L. Allman motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/07/2020. [11865144] (JFF) [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:16 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the notice of appeal dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, and are therefore not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) ([W]hen a district court expressly grants leave to amend, it is plain that the order is not final. Something more is both anticipated and required. In that event, a further step must be taken to fix an unequivocal terminal date for appealability, and to avoid the hazards of confusion or misunderstanding as to the time for appeal. A final judgment must be obtained before the case becomes appealable.) (internal citation omitted). A review of the record reflects that the district court has not yet entered a final order dismissing the complaint without leave to amend, or a final judgment. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant filing a new notice of appeal from a final order or judgment entered by the district court. See Litchfield v. Spielberg, 736 F.2d 1352, 1355 (9th Cir. 1984) (an appeal from a final judgment draws into question all earlier, non-final orders and rulings that produced the judgment). DISMISSED. [11860467] (WL) [Entered: 10/15/2020 03:18 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Frederick L. Allman opening brief due 11/27/2020. [11837639] (RT) [Entered: 09/25/2020 03:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.