Jose Castaneda v. State of California, et al
| STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, C.O.L.A., CITY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STEVE KIM, Mag. Judge, L.AS.C, JACK K. CONWAY, Disbarred Atty and JAN W. ANDERSON |
| JOSE CASTANEDA, AKA James Blume |
| 20-35841 |
| September 25, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Jose Castaneda motion to take judicial notice. Deficiencies: None. [11897923] (JFF) [Entered: 11/18/2020 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Jose Castaneda statement that the appeal should go forward. Served on 10/28/2020. [11880213] (JFF) [Entered: 11/03/2020 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Jose Castaneda motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11872564] (RR) [Entered: 10/27/2020 08:08 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): On September 30, 2020, this court issued an order staying appellate proceedings pending disposition of the objection to order filed in the district court. On October 5, 2020, the district court construed the objection as a motion for reconsideration of the August 6, 2020 judgment and denied the motion. The stay order filed September 30, 2020, is lifted and this appeal shall proceed. A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11853453] (CKP) [Entered: 10/09/2020 02:33 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Jose Castaneda response to courrt order. Served on 10/05/2020. [11852815] (JFF) [Entered: 10/08/2020 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely-filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that motion is still pending in the district court. The September 15, 2020 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending August 31, 2020 motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11842324] (CKP) [Entered: 09/30/2020 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11839611] (CKP) [Entered: 09/28/2020 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jose Castaneda opening brief due 11/27/2020. [11837719] (RT) [Entered: 09/25/2020 04:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
