Money Mailer, LLC v. Wade Brewer, et al
| MONEY MAILER, LLC |
| MONEY MAILER FRANCHISE CORP, JOSEPH J. CRACIUN, RYAN CARR, GARY M. MULLOY and JOHN PATINELLA |
| WADE G. BREWER |
| 20-35896 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellant Wade G. Brewer to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Wade G. Brewer opening brief due 01/06/2021. Appellees Ryan Carr, Joseph J. Craciun, Money Mailer Franchise Corp, Money Mailer, LLC, Gary M. Mulloy and John Patinella answering brief due 02/05/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11912439] (JN) [Entered: 12/02/2020 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Wade G. Brewer. New requested due date is 01/06/2021. [11912341] [20-35896] (Brown, Daniel) [Entered: 12/02/2020 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [11893926] (LW) [Entered: 11/16/2020 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Brian Janura for party(s) Appellee Joseph J. Craciun Appellee Gary M. Mulloy Appellee Money Mailer, LLC Appellee Ryan Carr Appellee Money Mailer Franchise Corp Appellee John Patinella, in case 20-35896. [11880748] (NAC) [Entered: 11/03/2020 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Brian J. Janura (Dorsey & Whitney LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100 Seattle, WA 98104-7043) for Appellees Money Mailer Franchise Corp, Money Mailer, LLC, Ryan Carr, Joseph J. Craciun, Gary M. Mulloy and John Patinella. Date of service: 11/03/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11880739] [20-35896] (Janura, Brian) [Entered: 11/03/2020 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL IN Assessment Conference, 11/12/2020, 2:30 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11867577] (LW) [Entered: 10/21/2020 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/20/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11865478]. [20-35896] (AD) [Entered: 10/20/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Wade G. Brewer Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/20/2020. [11865262] [20-35896] (Brown, Daniel) [Entered: 10/20/2020 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Wade G. Brewer Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/21/2020. Appellant Wade G. Brewer opening brief due 12/07/2020. Appellees Ryan Carr, Joseph J. Craciun, Money Mailer Franchise Corp, Money Mailer, LLC, Gary M. Mulloy and John Patinella answering brief due 01/06/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11858613] (JBS) [Entered: 10/14/2020 02:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
