Alice Hicks v. Thomas Skaar, et al
| PRINCETON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, TRACEY LEE SKAAR, THOMAS CIFFORD SKAAR and EVERGREEN VANCOUVER APARTMENTS, LLC |
| ALICE HICKS |
| 20-35918 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 2 ] filed by Ms. Alice Hicks. [11899981] (SD) [Entered: 11/19/2020 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 2 ] submitted by Ms. Alice Hicks is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11895667] (LA) [Entered: 11/17/2020 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 2 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Ms. Alice Hicks. Date of service: 11/16/2020. [11894684] [20-35918] (Hicks, Alice) [Entered: 11/16/2020 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Alice Hicks opening brief due 12/21/2020. Appellees Evergreen Vancouver Apartments, LLC, Princeton Property Management, Thomas Cifford Skaar and Tracey Lee Skaar answering brief due 01/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11867003] (JPD) [Entered: 10/21/2020 12:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
