Thomas Murphy v. Pretrial Services, et al
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT and PRETRIAL SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS ROBERT MURPHY
Case Number: 20-35935
Filed: October 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2020 Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the docket reflects that appellant has failed to file a complete response to the courts November 2, 2020 order to show cause. The court sua sponte grants appellant an extension of time to file a complete response to the order to show cause. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall file a response to the November 2, 2020 order to show cause. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. The Clerk shall send a copy of the November 2, 2020 order to show cause to appellant along with this order. [11908485] (CKP) [Entered: 11/29/2020 06:42 PM]
November 20, 2020 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Thomas Robert Murphy response to order to show cause. Served on 11/20/2020. [11901532] (CW) [Entered: 11/20/2020 02:36 PM]
November 20, 2020 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Thomas Robert Murphy motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/02/2020. [11901530] (CW) [Entered: 11/20/2020 02:34 PM]
November 20, 2020 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Thomas Robert Murphy 2nd motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/02/2020. [11901523] (CW) [Entered: 11/20/2020 02:33 PM]
November 20, 2020 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Thomas Robert Murphy motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/02/2020. [11901514] (CW) [Entered: 11/20/2020 02:31 PM]
November 20, 2020 Filing 3 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Thomas Robert Murphy opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 11/03/2020. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed. [11901506] (LA) [Entered: 11/20/2020 02:29 PM]
November 2, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The district courts judgment was entered on the docket on August 15, 2020. Appellants notice of appeal was received by this court on October 26, 2020 and filed in the district court on October 28, 2020. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(d). Accordingly, the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 60 days after entry of the district courts judgment. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending disposition of this order to show cause. [11878881] (CKP) [Entered: 11/02/2020 12:36 PM]
October 29, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Thomas Robert Murphy opening brief due 12/28/2020. [11876016] (JPD) [Entered: 10/29/2020 02:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Murphy v. Pretrial Services, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PRETRIAL SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: THOMAS ROBERT MURPHY
Represented By: Thomas Robert Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?