Federico Paz v. Al Ramirez, et al
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF OREGON, THIRD DISTRICT COURT, CITY OF CALDWELL and AL RAMIREZ, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant: FEDERICO PAZ
Case Number: 20-35952
Filed: November 5, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2020 Filing 12 Filed Appellant Federico Paz motion requesting appeals. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/23/2020. [11947464] (RL) [Entered: 12/29/2020 12:37 PM]
December 16, 2020 Filing 11 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Appellants motion to consolidate [ # 6 ] is denied. Appellant does not have any other appeals currently pending in this court. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. All other pending motions will be addressed after appellant complies with this order. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, or statement that the appeal should go forward. [11930230] (CKP) [Entered: 12/16/2020 02:49 PM]
December 16, 2020 Filing 10 Received copy of District Court order filed on 12/16/2020 ORDER re: Referral for determination of whether in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is revoked. Plaintiff may petition the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to grant in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Clerk of Court shall forward a copy of this Order to the Court of Appeals. [11929831] (RL) [Entered: 12/16/2020 11:56 AM]
December 9, 2020 Filing 9 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11920358] (CKP) [Entered: 12/09/2020 12:20 PM]
December 4, 2020 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Federico Paz motion to expedite case, for ext of time. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/04/2020. [11915274] (CW) [Entered: 12/04/2020 12:48 PM]
November 17, 2020 Filing 7 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to his letter of request filed on 11-16-2020. [11895344] (JR) [Entered: 11/17/2020 09:14 AM]
November 16, 2020 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Federico Paz motion to consolidate. Deficiencies: no other pending appeals. Served on 11/16/2020. [11895128] (CW) [Entered: 11/17/2020 06:51 AM]
November 16, 2020 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Federico Paz letter dated 11/16/2020 re: request for copy of rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11895124] (CW) [Entered: 11/17/2020 06:49 AM]
November 5, 2020 Filing 4 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Federico Paz opening brief of 3 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 11/05/2020 by Court via CM/ECF. Major deficiencies: briefing is stayed (IFP motion and motion to appoint counsel are pending), no certificate of service on appellee's counsel. [11882874] (LA) [Entered: 11/05/2020 10:39 AM]
November 5, 2020 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Federico Paz motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/02/2020. [11882852] (JPD) [Entered: 11/05/2020 10:28 AM]
November 5, 2020 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Federico Paz motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/02/2020. [11882801] (JPD) [Entered: 11/05/2020 10:01 AM]
November 5, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Federico Paz opening brief due 01/04/2021. Appellees Al Ramirez, et al. answering brief due 02/01/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11882785] (JPD) [Entered: 11/05/2020 09:52 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Federico Paz v. Al Ramirez, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STATE OF OREGON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THIRD DISTRICT COURT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF CALDWELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AL RAMIREZ, Warden
Represented By: Oscar Klaas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: FEDERICO PAZ
Represented By: Federico Paz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?