Praveen Khurana v. State of Idaho, et al
| ROBERT RINARD, DAPHNE HUANG, NEELAM KAKKAR, Wife and Husband, DOUGLAS FLEENOR, KAMAL VERMA, and Jane Doe (Husband and wife), STATE OF IDAHO, VIMAL VERMA, and Jane Doe (Husband and wife), DOREEN SULTMA, and spouse of Doreen Sulyma, ARUN KAKKAR, Wife and Husband and RENU VERMA, and John Doe (Wife and Husband) |
| PRAVEEN KEVIN KHURANA |
| 20-35964 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| PRAVEEN KHURANA V. STATE OF IDAHO, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11888417] (CKP) [Entered: 11/10/2020 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Praveen Kevin Khurana opening brief due 01/05/2021. [11886364] (JMR) [Entered: 11/09/2020 11:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
