Klamath Irrigation District, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al
| VAN BRIMMER DITCH COMPANY, SHASTA VIEW IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ROB UNRUH, BEN DUVAL, KLAMATH DRAINAGE DISTRICT, TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION |
| ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, JEFFREY NETTLETON, in his official capacity as Area Manager for the Klamath Area Reclamation Office, BRENDA BURMAN, Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, in her official capacity and DAVID BERNHARDT, acting Secretary of the Interior, in his official capacity |
| HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES |
| KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT |
| 20-36009 |
| November 19, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ET AL V. U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, ET AL
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: These cases are RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [11960924] [20-36009, 20-36020] (VS) [Entered: 01/12/2021 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 12/22/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11918191] [20-36009, 20-36020] (VS) [Entered: 12/08/2020 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Rachel E. Heron for party(s) Appellee Brenda Burman Appellee Ernest Conant Appellee David Bernhardt Appellee Jeffrey Nettleton Appellee United States Bureau of Reclamation, in case 20-36009. [11908898] (CW) [Entered: 11/30/2020 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Rachel Eileen Heron (U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division; P.O. Box 7415; Washington, DC 20044) for Appellees David Bernhardt, Brenda Burman, Ernest Conant, Jeffrey Nettleton and United States Bureau of Reclamation. Date of service: 11/30/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11908860] [20-36009] (Heron, Rachel) [Entered: 11/30/2020 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/25/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11906644]. [20-36009] (AD) [Entered: 11/25/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Klamath Irrigation District Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/25/2020. [11906595] [20-36009] (Lisieski, Christopher) [Entered: 11/25/2020 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Klamath Irrigation District Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/27/2020. Transcript ordered by 12/21/2020. Transcript due 01/19/2021. Appellant Klamath Irrigation District opening brief due 03/01/2021. Appellees David Bernhardt, Brenda Burman, Ernest Conant, Hoopa Valley Tribe, Jeffrey Nettleton, The Klamath Tribes and United States Bureau of Reclamation answering brief due 03/31/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11900098] (JBS) [Entered: 11/19/2020 04:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
