Jonathan Nelson, et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: JONATHAN NELSON and MARGO NELSON
Defendant / Appellee: SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC, a foreign limited liability company
Case Number: 20-36026
Filed: November 25, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2021 Filing 5 Filed order MEDIATION (LW): The existing briefing schedule is VACATED. The following briefing schedule shall govern this appeal: Appellants opening brief is due February 24, 2021; appellees answering brief is due March 26, 2021; appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days of service of the answering brief. [11952978] (SB) [Entered: 01/05/2021 01:31 PM]
December 8, 2020 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL IN Assessment Conference, 01/05/2021, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11918762] (LW) [Entered: 12/08/2020 12:18 PM]
December 2, 2020 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/02/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11913252]. [20-36026] (AD) [Entered: 12/02/2020 06:44 PM]
December 2, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jonathan Nelson and Margo Nelson Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/02/2020. [11912838] [20-36026] (Martin, Amanda) [Entered: 12/02/2020 02:32 PM]
November 25, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Jonathan Nelson and Margo Nelson Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/02/2020. Appellants Jonathan Nelson and Margo Nelson opening brief due 01/25/2021. Appellee Specialized Loan Servicing LLC answering brief due 02/25/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11906513] (RT) [Entered: 11/25/2020 11:46 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jonathan Nelson, et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JONATHAN NELSON
Represented By: Amanda Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MARGO NELSON
Represented By: Amanda Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC, a foreign limited liability company
Represented By: Garrett S. Garfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?