Donald Odoms v. Brandon Kelly, et al
| DONALD C. ODOMS |
| OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION and BRANDON KELLY |
| 20-36115 |
| December 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN and PATRICK J. BUMATAY): The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); see also Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003); Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 552-54 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc) (habeas challenge to parole decision requires a certificate of appealability when underlying conviction and sentence issued from a state court), overruled on other grounds by Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. 216 (2011). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11998490] (AF) [Entered: 02/09/2021 05:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 11/30/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11946996] (JPD) [Entered: 12/29/2020 08:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
