Leland Fore v. Andrew Saul
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant: LELAND THOMAS FORE
Case Number: 20-36118
Filed: December 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 11, 2022 LELAND FORE V. KILOLO KIJAKAZI

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2021 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the Ninth Cir. Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See FRAP 33 & Ninth Cir.R. 33-1. Mediation assessment conferences are not routinely scheduled in social security appeals. Csl are encouraged to contact circuit mediator if they believe this social security appeal has remand potential or is otherwise amenable to resolution. Specifically, csl are requested to contact the mediator if claimant has been awarded benefits after the district court's decision or if claimant is deceased. The mediator can also assist csl with procedural matters that may lead to the resolution of an appeal. Csl for the party contacting the Mediation Program are encouraged to copy csl for the other party to the appeal on any such requests. Info regarding the medation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11954895] (VS) [Entered: 01/06/2021 04:36 PM]
January 4, 2021 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/04/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11951926]. [20-36118] (AD) [Entered: 01/04/2021 06:44 PM]
January 4, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Leland Thomas Fore Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/04/2021. [11951854] [20-36118] (Talbot, Charles) [Entered: 01/04/2021 05:18 PM]
December 29, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Leland Thomas Fore Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/05/2021. Appellant Leland Thomas Fore opening brief due 02/26/2021. Appellee Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security answering brief due 03/29/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11947299] (JMR) [Entered: 12/29/2020 10:57 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Leland Fore v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: David Burdett
Represented By: Kerry Keefe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LELAND THOMAS FORE
Represented By: Charles W. Talbot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?