Raymond Forsman v. Jeremy Culumber, et al
| JEREMY W. CULUMBER and PORT OF SEATTLE |
| RAYMOND A. FORSMAN |
| 20-36126 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (KMW, MBC and EDM) [12005966] (RR) [Entered: 02/17/2021 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and ERIC D. MILLER) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. To date appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment entered in the district court on January 13, 2021. DISMISSED. [11982363] (WL) [Entered: 01/26/2021 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [11952828] (RR) [Entered: 01/05/2021 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raymond A. Forsman opening brief due 03/01/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11948390] (JPD) [Entered: 12/30/2020 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
