Matthew Mejia v. Clark Ducart
| CLARK E. DUCART, Warden |
| MATTHEW JAMES MEJIA |
| 20-55003 |
| January 3, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY and ERIC D. MILLER): We have received and reviewed appellants response to this courts January 6, 2020, order to show cause. The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of judgment. See 28 U.S.C. 2107, 2253(c)(2). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11593110] (AF) [Entered: 02/11/2020 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Matthew James Mejia response to order to show cause. Served on 01/14/2020. [11569745] (CW) [Entered: 01/22/2020 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 3 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 4 ]. Original Text: Filed Appellant Matthew James Mejia motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 01/06/2020. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/14/2020. [11569662] (CW) [Entered: 01/22/2020 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KMB): The record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the request for certificate of appealability because the notice of appeal was not filed or deposited for mailing in the prisons internal mail system within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment on November 8. 2019. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c). Within 21 days after this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of this request for certificate of appealability or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this request for certificate of appealability pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [11551349] (AF) [Entered: 01/06/2020 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 11/07/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11550391] (JBS) [Entered: 01/03/2020 01:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Matthew Mejia v. Clark Ducart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: CLARK E. DUCART, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Heather F. Crawford Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MATTHEW JAMES MEJIA | |
| Represented By: | Matthew James Mejia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
