Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco v. John Houston, et al
| ALANA W. ROBINSON, LAURA E. DUFFY, U.S. Attorney Chief, JOHN A. HOUSTON, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF SAN DIEGO, U.S. Gov. Court, MARIETTA IRENE GECKOS, U.S. Attorney Assistance and FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF SAN DIEGO, INC., U.S. Gov. Court |
| RAMIRO PLASCENCIA-OROZCO, AKA Alberto Jose Del Muro, AKA Alberto Jose Del Muro-Guerrero, AKA Alberto Jose Muro-Guerrero, AKA Raul Torres-Garcia |
| 20-55129 |
| February 6, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/23/2020. [11647586] (QDL) [Entered: 03/31/2020 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco response to order to show cause dated 02/12/2020. Served on 03/23/2020. [11647584] (QDL) [Entered: 03/31/2020 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11645671] (NAC) [Entered: 03/30/2020 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the docket reflects that appellant has failed to respond to the court's February 12, 2020 order. The court sua sponte grants appellant an extension of time to respond to the order. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall file a response to the February 12, 2020 order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. The Clerk shall send a copy of the February 12, 2020 order and attachments to appellant along with this order. [11629988] (OC) [Entered: 03/13/2020 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco response to order to show cause. [11618393] (RR) [Entered: 03/04/2020 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11594875] (CKP) [Entered: 02/12/2020 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco opening brief due 03/30/2020. (No appearance for Appellees, no answering brief deadlines set) [11588050] (HC) [Entered: 02/06/2020 12:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
