Alex Bilbrew v. Megan Brennan, et al
| YVONNE SMITH |
| ALEX BILBREW |
| MEGAN J. BRENNAN |
| 20-55148 |
| February 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Alex Bilbrew letter dated re: Due to the National emergency the nation is facing with a very big challenge, I wish that the Court would please grant an extension for the Brief Deadline from April 15, 2020 to May 15, 2020.. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11653953] (JFF) [Entered: 04/07/2020 11:37 AM] |
| Updated deadlines. Automatic 60 day extension Re: Notice Covid 19 (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]). Appellant Alex Bilbrew opening brief due 05/15/2020. Appellee Megan J. Brennan answering brief due 06/15/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11655723] (EU) [Entered: 04/08/2020 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 03/13/2020. [11629485] (BY) [Entered: 03/13/2020 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11606783] (CKP) [Entered: 02/24/2020 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Alex Bilbrew opening brief due 04/15/2020. Appellee Megan J. Brennan answering brief due 05/15/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11595373] (RT) [Entered: 02/12/2020 03:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
