Keith Blackwell v. Dhaliwal Jaspal, et al
| Y. CARLON, STEVE LANGFORD, JACK FOX, JUAN D. CASTILLO, Dr. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| M. LIN, Clinical Director, RUDY LEYVES, DHALIWAL JASPAL, M.D., R. BLAIR, Counselor and FLOYD, Counselor |
| KEITH L. BLACKWELL |
| 20-55198 |
| February 25, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Keith L. Blackwell motion requesting a stay order. Deficiencies: Case closed. Served on 04/04/2020. [11656502] (QDL) [Entered: 04/09/2020 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and ERIC D. MILLER) : A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also United States v. Almany, 872 F.2d 924, 926 (9th Cir. 1989) (order denying motion for discovery is not appealable); In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11645812] (RT) [Entered: 03/30/2020 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Keith L. Blackwell opening brief due 04/27/2020. Appellees R. Blair, Floyd, Dhaliwal Jaspal, Rudy Leyves and M. Lin answering brief due 05/27/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11608152] (RT) [Entered: 02/25/2020 11:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
