Robert Lacambra v. Jean Shiamoto, et al
Defendant: CITATION PROCESSING CENTER, an unknown entity opereating in California, as a state actor, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, a California agency in its official capacity and AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT LACAMBRA
Defendant / Appellee: JEAN SHIAMOTO, individually and STEVE GORDON, DMV Director, official capacity
Case Number: 20-55292
Filed: March 19, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2020 Filing 5 Mail returned on 05/08/2020 addressed to Robert Lacambra, re: 03/20/2020 order [ # 2 ]. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, unclaimed, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found. [11684961] (LA) [Entered: 05/08/2020 12:10 PM]
May 4, 2020 Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 03/20/2020). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [11678730] (CKP) [Entered: 05/03/2020 01:19 PM]
April 28, 2020 Filing 3 Mail returned on 04/28/2020 addressed to Robert Lacambra, re: 03/19/2020 Case Opening Information [ # 1 ]. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, unclaimed, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; unable to locate forwarding address. [11673882] (JBS) [Entered: 04/28/2020 09:17 AM]
March 20, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): The appeal filed March 18, 2020 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The briefing schedule shall be established as follows: appellants opening brief is due April 20, 2020; appellees answering brief is due May 18, 2020; and appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The appeal and any motions pending at the time briefing is completed shall be referred to the next available motions panel for disposition. No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31- 2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [11637300] (RT) [Entered: 03/20/2020 04:03 PM]
March 19, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: To be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal, C.R. 3-3. [11635157] (JBS) [Entered: 03/19/2020 10:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Lacambra v. Jean Shiamoto, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITATION PROCESSING CENTER, an unknown entity opereating in California, as a state actor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, a California agency in its official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ROBERT LACAMBRA
Represented By: Robert Lacambra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JEAN SHIAMOTO, individually
Represented By: Thomas Michael McMahon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STEVE GORDON, DMV Director, official capacity
Represented By: Thomas Michael McMahon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?