Simona Tanasescu v. Matthew Kremer, et al
| MIRELA MOSOIU, ZOE CRISTINA SUCIU, CRISTIAN COROIAN, ADRIAN COROIAN, THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE OFFICE OF ROBERT K. JOHNSON, JEFFREY H. SHERTER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE OFFICES OF MATTHEW M. KREMER, DORIN COROIAN, E. DANIEL BORS III, ROBERT K. JOHNSON, MATTHEW MARKUS KREMER and E. DANIEL BORS, Jr. |
| SIMONA TANASESCU |
| 20-55326 |
| March 25, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MF): Appeal No. 20-55326 is dismissed as duplicative of pending appeal No. 19-56350. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court for appeal No. 20-55326. The Clerk will amend the docket in appeal No. 19-56350 to reflect that the minor child S.T. is an appellant along with appellant Tanasescu. [11649196] (AF) [Entered: 04/01/2020 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Simona Tanasescu opening brief due 05/28/2020. Appellees E. Daniel Bors III, E. Daniel Bors Jr., Adrian Coroian, Cristian Coroian, Dorin Coroian, Robert K. Johnson, Matthew Markus Kremer, Mirela Mosoiu, Jeffrey H. Sherter, Zoe Cristina Suciu, The Office of Robert K. Johnson, The Offices of Matthew M. Kremer, The State Bar of California and United States of America answering brief due 06/29/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11641904] (RT) [Entered: 03/25/2020 03:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
