FTC v. Jason Cardiff, et al

FTC v. Jason Cardiff, et al

Defendant:	DANIELLE CADIZ, individually, AKA Danielle Walker, ADVANCED MENS INSTITUTE PROLONGZ LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA AMI, REDWOOD SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, REDWOOD SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation, CAROLS PLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, INDENTIFY, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, RUNAWAY PRODUCTS, LCC and REDWOOD SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a California corporation, DBA Rengalife
Other:	JACQUES POUJADE
Defendant / Appellant:	EUNJUNG CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Nevada corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Delawar, JASON CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Nevada corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Delaware, JASON CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation, et al.; and EUNJUNG CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation, et al., AKA Eunjung Lee, AKA Eunjung No
Plaintiff / Appellee:	FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Receiver:	ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES LLC, Temporary Receiver
Case Number:	20-55397
Filed:	April 15, 2020
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
May 12, 2020	Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SZ): Appellants motion to voluntarily withdraw without prejudice their appeal of the district courts March 16, 2020 order authorizing the receiver to sell property (March 16 Order) (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ] ) is denied without prejudice. If appellants seek voluntary dismissal, the motion must request dismissal with prejudice. Within 14 days of this order, appellants shall file either a renewed motion for voluntary dismissal of their appeal of the March 16 Order, requesting dismissal with prejudice, or a response to the portion of the April 17, 2020 order to show cause regarding the March 16 Order. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 7 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss appellants appeal of the March 16 Order pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. The April 17, 2020 order to show cause and all pending motions will be addressed by separate order. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11688254] (RT) [Entered: 05/12/2020 12:50 PM]
May 8, 2020	Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellee FTC reply to response to Court order dated 04/17/2020. Date of service: 05/08/2020. [11685016] [20-55397] (Hegedus, Mark) [Entered: 05/08/2020 12:28 PM]
May 1, 2020	Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellants Eunjung Cardiff and Jason Cardiff response to Court order dated 04/17/2020. Date of service: 05/01/2020. [11678056] [20-55397] (Cochell, Stephen) [Entered: 05/01/2020 01:07 PM]
May 1, 2020	Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellee Robb Evans & Associates LLC Motion for miscellaneous relief []. Date of service: 04/30/2020. [11678003] [20-55397] (Fletcher, Michael) [Entered: 05/01/2020 12:36 PM]
April 30, 2020	Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Eunjung Cardiff and Jason Cardiff response to order to show cause dated 04/17/2020. Date of service: 04/30/2020. [11677012] [20-55397] (Cochell, Stephen) [Entered: 04/30/2020 02:10 PM]
April 24, 2020	Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee Robb Evans & Associates LLC Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 04/24/2020. [11671574] [20-55397] (Fletcher, Michael) [Entered: 04/24/2020 05:23 PM]
April 24, 2020	Filing 4 Entered appearance of Appellee Robb Evans & Associates LLC. [11671492] (SLM) [Entered: 04/24/2020 04:26 PM]
April 17, 2020	Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SZ) : This appeal challenges: (1) the district courts March 10, 2020 order denying appellants motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction; (2) the district courts March 16, 2020 order authorizing the receiver to sell property; and, (3) the district courts March 31, 2020 contempt order. A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction to review some or all of these orders. sz/MOATT 2 20-55397 The court may lack jurisdiction to review the March 10, 2020 order because an order denying a motion to modify or dissolve an injunction is appealable only if the motion raised new matter not considered at the time of the original injunction. See Gon v. First State Ins. Co., 871 F.2d 863, 865-66 (9th Cir. 1989). The court may lack jurisdiction to review the March 16, 2020 order authorizing the receiver to sell property because the court only has jurisdiction over appeals which deny such authorization. See 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(2) (the court has jurisdiction over appeals from [i]nterlocutory orders refusing orders to take steps to accomplish the purposes [of the receivership], such as directing sales or other disposals of property); see also SEC v. Am. Principals Holdings, Inc., 817 F.2d 1349, 1351 (9th Cir. 1987) (jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(2) is narrowly interpreted and restricted to orders that refuse to take steps to accomplish purpose of receivership). The court may lack jurisdiction to review the March 31, 2020 order because an order of civil contempt entered against a party to ongoing litigation is generally not immediately appealable. See Koninklijke Philips Elecs. N.V. v. KSD Tech., Inc., 539 F.3d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir. 2008). Within 14 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or limited in scope. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 7 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11664925] (RT) [Entered: 04/17/2020 04:06 PM]
April 16, 2020	Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Mark S. Hegedus (Office of the General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580) for Appellee FTC. Substitution for Attorney Mark S. Hegedus, Esquire for Appellee FTC. Date of service: 04/16/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11662988] [20-55397] (Hegedus, Mark) [Entered: 04/16/2020 11:56 AM]
April 15, 2020	Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction. Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [11662233] (RT) [Entered: 04/15/2020 04:09 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: FTC v. Jason Cardiff, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Other: JACQUES POUJADE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: DANIELLE CADIZ, individually, AKA Danielle Walker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ADVANCED MENS INSTITUTE PROLONGZ LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA AMI
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: REDWOOD SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: REDWOOD SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CAROLS PLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited liability partnership
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: INDENTIFY, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: RUNAWAY PRODUCTS, LCC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: REDWOOD SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a California corporation, DBA Rengalife
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: EUNJUNG CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Nevada corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Delawar
Represented By:	Stephen R. Cochell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: JASON CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Nevada corporation; Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a Delaware
Represented By:	Stephen R. Cochell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: JASON CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation, et al.;
Represented By:	Stephen R. Cochell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: EUNJUNG CARDIFF, individually and as an owner, officer, director, or member of Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc. a California corporation, et al., AKA Eunjung Lee, AKA Eunjung No
Represented By:	Stephen R. Cochell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Represented By:	Stacy Rene Procter Esquire
Represented By:	Mark S. Hegedus Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Receiver: ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES LLC, Temporary Receiver
Represented By:	Craig A. Welin
Represented By:	Hal D. Goldflam
Represented By:	Michael Gerard Fletcher
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?