Daisy Reyna v. County of Los Angeles, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAISY REYNA, as an individual and as Guardian Ad Litem for D.S. and Z.S., two minor and MARIAH MONTES, as Guardian ad Litem for D.S. and Z.S., two minors
Defendant / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, MICHELE LOYA-CHHABRA, DCFS Social Worker, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and KAREN VANCE, DCFS Supervisor
Case Number: 20-55399
Filed: April 15, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 20, 2021 DAISY REYNA V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2020 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11685928] (BLS) [Entered: 05/11/2020 08:40 AM]
April 23, 2020 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 05/07/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11669743] (BLS) [Entered: 04/23/2020 12:35 PM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Daisy Reyna and Mariah Montes Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/21/2020. [11667905] [20-55399] (Darling, Erin) [Entered: 04/21/2020 07:41 PM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/21/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11667257]. [20-55399] (AD) [Entered: 04/21/2020 12:44 PM]
April 21, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellees County of Los Angeles, Department of Children and Family Services, Michele Loya-Chhabra and Karen Vance Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/21/2020. [11667082] [20-55399] (Foster, Danielle) [Entered: 04/21/2020 11:18 AM]
April 15, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Mariah Montes and Daisy Reyna Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/22/2020. Transcript ordered by 05/15/2020. Transcript due 06/15/2020. Appellants Mariah Montes and Daisy Reyna opening brief due 07/23/2020. Appellees County of Los Angeles, Department of Children and Family Services, Michele Loya-Chhabra and Karen Vance answering brief due 08/24/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11662222] (RT) [Entered: 04/15/2020 04:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daisy Reyna v. County of Los Angeles, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DAISY REYNA, as an individual and as Guardian Ad Litem for D.S. and Z.S., two minor
Represented By: Erin R. Darling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MARIAH MONTES, as Guardian ad Litem for D.S. and Z.S., two minors
Represented By: Erin R. Darling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
Represented By: Danielle Christine Foster
Represented By: Jill Williams Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHELE LOYA-CHHABRA, DCFS Social Worker
Represented By: Danielle Christine Foster
Represented By: Jill Williams Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Represented By: Danielle Christine Foster
Represented By: Jill Williams Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KAREN VANCE, DCFS Supervisor
Represented By: Danielle Christine Foster
Represented By: Jill Williams Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?