Guillermo Vera v. Christian Pfeiffer, et al
| A. GONZALEZ, Correctional, T. YEDER, Correctional Counselor, official capacity, W. MASSIE, Officer, official capacity, J. QUINONES, Officer, official capacity, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, official capacity, CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, official capacity, R. PHILLIPS, Correctional, BALLESTEROS, State Officer, official capacity, M. GONZALEZ, Officer, official capacity, B. BAKER, Correctional, FLORES, Sgt., K. POWERS, Correctional and A. RENTERIA, Correctional |
| GUILLERMO VERA |
| 20-55400 |
| April 15, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, JHN and DPC) [11719554] (CW) [Entered: 06/12/2020 06:22 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and DANIEL PAUL COLLINS): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the March 26, 2020 orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11698275] (AF) [Entered: 05/21/2020 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Guillermo Vera opening brief due 06/12/2020. [11662234] (JMR) [Entered: 04/15/2020 04:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
