Raul Arellano v. K. Dean, et al
| CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden |
| K. DEAN, Dr., M. GLYNN, Deputy Director at California Correctional Health Care Services, S. ROBERTS, M.D., Chief Medical Executive and S. PASHA |
| RAUL ARELLANO |
| 20-55505 |
| May 6, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, JHN and DPC) [11719550] (CW) [Entered: 06/12/2020 06:17 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and DANIEL PAUL COLLINS): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the April 20, 2020 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11698301] (AF) [Entered: 05/21/2020 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raul Arellano opening brief due 07/13/2020. Appellees K. Dean, M. Glynn, S. Pasha and S. Roberts answering brief due 08/13/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11682874] (RT) [Entered: 05/06/2020 04:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
