Lanard Toys Limited v. Dimple Child LLC
| DIMPLE CHILD LLC |
| LANARD TOYS LIMITED |
| 20-55512 |
| May 11, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| LANARD TOYS LIMITED V. DIMPLE CHILD LLC |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11720196] (CL) [Entered: 06/12/2020 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dimple Child LLC response opposing motion ([ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 05/28/2020. [11704191] [20-55512] (Lobbin, Stephen) [Entered: 05/28/2020 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee Lanard Toys Limited Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 05/22/2020. [11699324] [20-55512] (Sybert, Richard) [Entered: 05/22/2020 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 06/12/2020, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11696151] (CL) [Entered: 05/19/2020 05:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/16/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11693124]. [20-55512] (AD) [Entered: 05/16/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dimple Child LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/16/2020. [11693110] [20-55512] (Lobbin, Stephen) [Entered: 05/16/2020 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Dimple Child LLC Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/18/2020. Transcript ordered by 06/08/2020. Transcript due 07/07/2020. Appellant Dimple Child LLC opening brief due 08/18/2020. Appellee Lanard Toys Limited answering brief due 09/18/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11686608] (RT) [Entered: 05/11/2020 01:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lanard Toys Limited v. Dimple Child LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: DIMPLE CHILD LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stephen M. Lobbin Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: LANARD TOYS LIMITED | |
| Represented By: | Richard Paul Sybert |
| Represented By: | Reid E. Dammann Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
