Felipe Diaz v. T. Lindquist, et al

Felipe Diaz v. T. Lindquist, et al

Defendant / Appellee:	C. SPENCER, C.O.; HCA - D1 Escort 3, individual and official capacity, D. HENRY, C.O.; D1 - floor 2 - EOP, individual and official capacity, E. ENGLAND, C.O.; D1 - ESCRT-2, individual and official capacity, E. TORRES, C.O.; D3 Sand E #1, individual and official capacity, W. REAUME, Corr. Lieutenant, inidividual and official capacity, D. MOISA, C.O. D1, Floor 1, individual and official capacity, A. ADEMOYE, C.O.; HCA - D1 - ESCRT-1, individual and official capacity, B. GONZALES, D-Yard, Building Sgt-EOP, individual and official capacity, BAUGHMAN, Deputy Chief Warden at CSP-SAC, J. FLORES GOMEZ, C.O. - D1 Control, individual and official capacity, T. LINDQUIST, Law Library Coordiantor at SCP-SAC A-Yard and R. GOMEZ, C.O.; individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:	FELIPE DIAZ
Case Number:	20-55516
Filed:	May 12, 2020
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
June 26, 2020	Filing 11 Filed order (SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and RYAN D. NELSON): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Appellants appeal from the final judgment entered in the district court on May 11, 2020 is proceeding in this court as appeal No. 20-55571. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11734715] (AF) [Entered: 06/26/2020 10:28 AM]
June 22, 2020	Filing 10 Filed Appellant Felipe Diaz motion for court response regarding pending motions. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/16/2020. [11729451] (CW) [Entered: 06/22/2020 02:20 PM]
June 12, 2020	Filing 9 Filed Appellant Felipe Diaz motion request for copy of transcripts. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/09/2020. [11720441] (CW) [Entered: 06/12/2020 02:18 PM]
June 8, 2020	Filing 8 Filed Appellant Felipe Diaz motion - second motion for correction of caption and service. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/02/2020. [11715267] (CW) [Entered: 06/09/2020 07:40 AM]
June 8, 2020	Filing 7 Filed Appellant Felipe Diaz letter dated 06/02/2020 re: request for status of motions - sent docket. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11715265] (CW) [Entered: 06/09/2020 07:38 AM]
June 8, 2020	Filing 6 Filed Appellant Felipe Diaz motion for release of transcripts, motions and pleadings. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/03/2020. [11715263] (CW) [Entered: 06/09/2020 07:37 AM]
June 1, 2020	Filing 5 Filed Appellant Felipe Diaz motion to appoint counsel, ext of time to file response to 5/14/20 order. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/26/2020. [11707311] (CW) [Entered: 06/01/2020 04:12 PM]
May 26, 2020	Filing 4 Sent: Appellant Felipe Diaz rules. [ # 3 ] [11701598] (ER) [Entered: 05/26/2020 05:16 PM]
May 26, 2020	Filing 3 Filed Appellant Felipe Diaz letter dated 05/20/2020 re: request for corrections to be made, request for rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11701530] (CW) [Entered: 05/26/2020 04:52 PM]
May 14, 2020	Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the district courts final judgment entered on May 11, 2020. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is stayed. [11691225] (CKP) [Entered: 05/14/2020 02:55 PM]
May 12, 2020	Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Felipe Diaz opening brief due 07/06/2020. Appellees A. Ademoye, Baughman, E. England, J. Flores Gomez, R. Gomez, B. Gonzales, D. Henry, T. Lindquist, D. Moisa, W. Reaume, C. Spencer and E. Torres answering brief due 08/05/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11687985] (JMR) [Entered: 05/12/2020 11:09 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Felipe Diaz v. T. Lindquist, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: C. SPENCER, C.O.; HCA - D1 Escort 3, individual and official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: D. HENRY, C.O.; D1 - floor 2 - EOP, individual and official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: E. ENGLAND, C.O.; D1 - ESCRT-2, individual and official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: E. TORRES, C.O.; D3 Sand E #1, individual and official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: W. REAUME, Corr. Lieutenant, inidividual and official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: D. MOISA, C.O. D1, Floor 1, individual and official capacity
Represented By:	Arthur B. Mark Esquire III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: A. ADEMOYE, C.O.; HCA - D1 - ESCRT-1, individual and official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: B. GONZALES, D-Yard, Building Sgt-EOP, individual and official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BAUGHMAN, Deputy Chief Warden at CSP-SAC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: J. FLORES GOMEZ, C.O. - D1 Control, individual and official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: T. LINDQUIST, Law Library Coordiantor at SCP-SAC A-Yard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: R. GOMEZ, C.O.; individual and official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: FELIPE DIAZ
Represented By:	Felipe Diaz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?