Tarek Fouad v. The State of Qatar, et al
| TAREK A. FOUAD, derivatively on behalf of nominal defendant Digital Soula Systems |
| DIGITAL SOULA SYSTEMS, Nominal Defendant, Real Party in Interest, THE STATE OF QATAR and QATAR ARMED FORCES |
| 20-55531 |
| May 15, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| TAREK FOUAD V. THE STATE OF QATAR |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 06/10/2020, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11709335] (VS) [Entered: 06/03/2020 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 8 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/01/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11706809]. [20-55531] (AD) [Entered: 06/01/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellees The State of Qatar and Qatar Armed Forces Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/01/2020. [11706362] [20-55531] (Fitzsimmons, Amanda) [Entered: 06/01/2020 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/21/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11697943]. [20-55531] (AD) [Entered: 05/21/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tarek A. Fouad Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/21/2020. [11697733] [20-55531] (Webb, Patrick) [Entered: 05/21/2020 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Kevin Walsh, Stanley Joseph Panikowski III for party(s) Appellee The State of Qatar Appellee Qatar Armed Forces, in case 20-55531. [11697412] (RR) [Entered: 05/20/2020 07:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Stanley J. Panikowski (DLA Piper LLP (US), 401 B Street, Suite 1700, San Diego, CA 92101-4297) for Appellees Qatar Armed Forces and The State of Qatar. Date of service: 05/20/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11696991] [20-55531] (Panikowski, Stanley) [Entered: 05/20/2020 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kevin Walsh (DLA Piper LLP (US), 1251 Avenue of the Americas, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10020-1104) for Appellees Qatar Armed Forces and The State of Qatar. Date of service: 05/20/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11696808] [20-55531] (Walsh, Kevin) [Entered: 05/20/2020 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tarek A. Fouad Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/22/2020. Appellant Tarek A. Fouad opening brief due 07/20/2020. Appellees Digital Soula Systems, Qatar Armed Forces and The State of Qatar answering brief due 08/20/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11692925] (RT) [Entered: 05/15/2020 04:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
