William Wallace, II v. Department of Corrections and, et al
| KENDRIC CHRISTIAN JOHNSON, CRAIG DENNY MILLER, Jr. and SCOTT ALLEN HAAG |
| FRANCO, Correctional Officer, individual, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, UNKNOWN, individual and official capacities, URIBE, Mr., Correctional Officer, in individual capacity and WADE, Sergeant Correctional Officer, individual |
| WILLIAM JAMES MATHEW WALLACE II |
| 20-55570 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| WILLIAM WALLACE, II V. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant William James Mathew Wallace, II opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 07/08/2020. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed (IFP motion pending). [11752304] (KWG) [Entered: 07/14/2020 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court filed on 06/04/2020. [11741422] (QDL) [Entered: 07/02/2020 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant William James Mathew Wallace, II motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/16/2020. [11737311] (QDL) [Entered: 06/29/2020 05:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant William James Mathew Wallace II opening brief due 07/29/2020. [11705635] (RT) [Entered: 05/29/2020 03:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
