Herring Networks, Inc. v. Rachel Maddow, et al
| COMCAST CORPORATION, MSNBC CABLE, LLC, NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC and RACHEL MADDOW |
| HERRING NETWORKS, INC. |
| 20-55579 |
| June 3, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/10/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11717487]. [20-55579] (AD) [Entered: 06/10/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Herring Networks, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/10/2020. [11717362] [20-55579] (Siegel, Amnon) [Entered: 06/10/2020 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Herring Networks, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/10/2020. Transcript ordered by 07/02/2020. Transcript due 08/03/2020. Appellant Herring Networks, Inc. opening brief due 09/10/2020. Appellees Comcast Corporation, MSNBC Cable, LLC, Rachel Maddow and NBCUniversal Media, LLC answering brief due 10/13/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11710129] (RT) [Entered: 06/03/2020 03:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.