Victor Sanchez v. S. Frauenheim

Victor Sanchez v. S. Frauenheim

Respondent / Appellee:	S. FRAUENHEIM
Petitioner / Appellant:	VICTOR SANCHEZ
Case Number:	20-55592
Filed:	June 9, 2020
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
June 10, 2020	Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KB): The record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the request for certificate of appealability because the notice of appeal was not filed or deposited for mailing in the prisons internal mail system within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment on April 7, 2020. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c). The record reflects that appellant has not filed a motion in the district court to extend or reopen time for appeal and that the notice of appeal was due during the COVID-19 public health crisis. See Fed R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Within 60 days after this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of this request for certificate of appealability or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this request for certificate of appealability pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [11717458] (RT) [Entered: 06/10/2020 12:25 PM]
June 9, 2020	Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 04/07/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11715390] (JMR) [Entered: 06/09/2020 08:54 AM]

Date Filed

Document Text

June 10, 2020

Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KB): The record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the request for certificate of appealability because the notice of appeal was not filed or deposited for mailing in the prisons internal mail system within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment on April 7, 2020. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c). The record reflects that appellant has not filed a motion in the district court to extend or reopen time for appeal and that the notice of appeal was due during the COVID-19 public health crisis. See Fed R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Within 60 days after this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of this request for certificate of appealability or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this request for certificate of appealability pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [11717458] (RT) [Entered: 06/10/2020 12:25 PM]

June 9, 2020

Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 04/07/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11715390] (JMR) [Entered: 06/09/2020 08:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Victor Sanchez v. S. Frauenheim
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: S. FRAUENHEIM
Represented By:	Daniel Rogers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: VICTOR SANCHEZ
Represented By:	Victor Sanchez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?