Rochelle Bailey v. Constitution Life Insurance Co, et al
Defendant / Appellee: DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive, CONSTITUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL EXECUTIVE FUND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and PENNCORP FINANCIAL
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROCHELLE BAILEY
Case Number: 20-55645
Filed: June 23, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2020 Filing 5 Received copy of District Court order filed on 07/09/2020. [11748563] (JFF) [Entered: 07/10/2020 10:55 AM]
July 6, 2020 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Rochelle Bailey motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11744704] (JFF) [Entered: 07/07/2020 02:15 PM]
July 2, 2020 Filing 3 Mail returned on 07/01/2020 addressed to Rochelle Bailey, re: 06/24/2020 order [ # 2 ]. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward. Resending to: 6810 Ginger Lane, Fontana, CA 92336. [11741488]--[Edited: address updated. 07/02/2020 by SLM] (LA) [Entered: 07/02/2020 04:54 PM]
June 24, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The district courts judgment was entered on the docket on March 25, 2020. Appellants notice of appeal was filed in the district court on June 22, 2020. Accordingly, the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(c); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). The record reflects that appellant has not filed a motion in the district court to extend or reopen time for appeal and that the notice of appeal was due during the COVID-19 public health crisis. See Fed R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Within 60 days after the date of this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. A review of appellants notice of appeal reflects that appellant may be challenging a California state court decision. If appellant wishes to challenge a state court decision, she must re-file her notice of appeal with the appropriate state court. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11732226] (CKP) [Entered: 06/24/2020 12:42 PM]
June 23, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Rochelle Bailey opening brief due 08/21/2020. Appellees Constitution Life Insurance Company, Does, National Executive Fund Life Insurance Company and PennCorp Financial answering brief due 09/21/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11730950] (JBS) [Entered: 06/23/2020 02:17 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rochelle Bailey v. Constitution Life Insurance Co, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CONSTITUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Martin Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NATIONAL EXECUTIVE FUND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PENNCORP FINANCIAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ROCHELLE BAILEY
Represented By: Rochelle Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?