Michael Spengler v. Los Angeles County District At
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Respondent / Appellee: LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Case Number: 20-55694
Filed: July 9, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2020 Filing 10 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to his letter of request filed on 08/31/2020. [11810598] (JR) [Entered: 09/02/2020 10:44 AM]
August 31, 2020 Filing 9 Received Appellant Michael R. Spengler request for copy of docket sheet; FRAP rules; other documents. [11808798] (NAC) [Entered: 09/01/2020 07:41 AM]
August 31, 2020 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Michael R. Spengler motion to stay and to expedite. Deficiencies: None. [11808781] (NAC) [Entered: 09/01/2020 07:40 AM]
August 31, 2020 Filing 7 Received notice of change of address dated 08/21/2020 from Michael R. Spengler. New address: T.T.C.F. 450 Bauchet Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. (address already on file) [11808779] (NAC) [Entered: 09/01/2020 07:38 AM]
August 18, 2020 Filing 6 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER and SUSAN P. GRABER) The request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is denied because appellants 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition fails to state any federal constitutional claims debatable among jurists of reason. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2)-(3); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); see also Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Wilson v. Belleque, 554 F.3d 816, 825-26 (9th Cir. 2009). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11793653] (RY) [Entered: 08/18/2020 02:31 PM]
August 14, 2020 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Michael R. Spengler motion to expedite; stay requested. Deficiencies: None. [11789784] (NAC) [Entered: 08/14/2020 01:42 PM]
August 14, 2020 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Michael R. Spengler motion to have USDC docket forwarded to COA. Deficiencies: None. [11789780] (NAC) [Entered: 08/14/2020 01:40 PM]
August 7, 2020 Filing 3 Received copy of District Court notice filed on 08/06/2020. NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to the Notice of Appeal item 10 was linked to the incorrect document. The Notice of appeal is appealing item 6 filed on 6/14/20 entered on 6/15/20. [The 9th CCA will be informed.] [11780666] (NAC) [Entered: 08/07/2020 07:22 AM]
August 7, 2020 Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [11780665] (NAC) [Entered: 08/07/2020 07:20 AM]
July 9, 2020 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 06/23/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. (Electronic:PACER) [11747093] (WL) [Entered: 07/09/2020 10:15 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Spengler v. Los Angeles County District At
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Represented By: Michael R. Spengler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?