Michael Spengler v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's D, et al
| RICHARD MACHADO, Detective, individual capacity, SHAMAR JACKSON, individual capacity, BEAN, investigator, individual capacity, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, TWIN TOWERS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Tower Two Clinic, IWIG, Detective, individual capacity, BEBON, Detective, individual capacity, RUSSON, Depurty, individual capacity, DAVID GUNNER, Deputy, individual capacity, MIKE CARRILLO, Deputy, individual capacity, ADAM KRISTE, Deputy, individual capacity, AGUIRRE, Detective, individual capacity, ROBERT GRAY, Deputy, individual capacity and URIBE, Detective, individual capacity |
| MICHAEL R. SPENGLER |
| 20-55718 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Granting Motion to dismiss the case pursuant to rule 42b filed by Appellant Michael R. Spengler. This order shall constitute the mandate. [11774151] (CKP) [Entered: 08/03/2020 01:54 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Michael R. Spengler motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Deficiencies: None. [11769147] (RR) [Entered: 07/28/2020 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11755212] (CKP) [Entered: 07/16/2020 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael R. Spengler opening brief due 09/08/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11753952] (JPD) [Entered: 07/15/2020 01:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
